Hallo,
wäre dankbar, wenn man jemand schauen könnte,wo meine Fehler liegen.
3.Aufgabe: korrekte Zeitform
1. Just before the child hit the side of the green car, it has overtaken her.
2. When he has called the ambulance, Michael went back to help Antje and the driver of the white car.
3. Before the constable wrote down their names and addresses, the cyclist had been taking to hospital in the ambulance.
4. After the sergeant had asked them abpout the accident, she asked them about the theft.
5. Before the thief took the bag, he made sure no-one was looking.
6. Before Antje asked how the little girl was, they told the sergeant what was happened.
7. After they had left the police station, they went back to their hotel.
8. As soon as they got back to their hotel, they had a drink in the bar to calm their nerves.
4.Aufgabe: richtige Form des dick markierten Wortes.
1. The green car quickly drove away after the accident.
2. Antje and Michael ran to help the child immediately.
3. The driver of another kindly car stopped to help them.
4. The child was bleeding heavily.
5. She was obviously in bad shape.
6. A thief took a bag out of the back of a white car and opened it sneaky.
7. The thief took the lap-top while everybody else was helping the child probably.
8. The thief took callours advantage of the situation.
5.Aufgabe: Ins Passiv setzen
1.The green car overtook the little girl.- The little girl is overtaken by the green car.
2. Antje and the driver of a white car helped the child.- The child was helped by Antje and the driver of the white car.
3. The driver of the white car applied a bandage to the child's head.- A bandage was applied to the child's head by the driver of the white car.
4. The driver of the white car had left the back of his car open.- The back of his car had left opened by the driver of the white car.
5. A thief took a lap-top from the back of gthe car.- A lap-top from the back of the car was taken by a thief.
6. The police questioned Antje and Michael about the accident and the theft.- Antje and Michael was questioned about the accident and the theft by the police.
7. The police caught the driver of the green car later. - The driver of the green car was caught later by the police.
Danke,für eure Hilfe
MfG,Sabrina
Zeitform,richtige Form?,Passiv
-
Dublinfan
Kann aus Zeitgründen nur die ersten 8 machen.
1. Just before the child hit the side of the green car, it had overtaken her.
2. When he had called the ambulance, Michael went back to help Antje and the driver of the white car.
3. Before the constable wrote down their names and addresses, the cyclist had been taken to hospital in the ambulance.
4. After the sergeant had asked them about the accident, she asked them about the theft.
5. Before the thief took the bag, he had made sure no-one was looking.
6. Before Antje asked how the little girl was, they told the sergeant what had happened.
7. After they had left the police station, they went back to their hotel.
8. As soon as they had got back to their hotel, they had a drink in the bar to calm their nerves.
Das sind alles Sätze, wo Past Perfect drin vorkommt.
Das läuft so ab:
zwei Handlungen finden in der Verg. statt.
Die eine der beiden liegt aber noch vor der anderen.
Die, die eben vor der anderen liegt, muß im Past Perfect stehen. Das bildest
du immer mit had (egal ob he she it !) und dann mit der 3. Form des
Verbs (wenn unregelmäßig) ansonsten -ed anhängen.
Die Handlung, die dann danach kommt, muß wieder im Simple Past stehen.
Ich denke, die Schwierigkeit besteht darin, dass man da immer sehr
genau schauen muß, welche Handlung denn nun wirklich die erste war.
Besonders dann, wenn da so Worte wie before und after drin vorkommen.
1. Just before the child hit the side of the green car, it had overtaken her.
2. When he had called the ambulance, Michael went back to help Antje and the driver of the white car.
3. Before the constable wrote down their names and addresses, the cyclist had been taken to hospital in the ambulance.
4. After the sergeant had asked them about the accident, she asked them about the theft.
5. Before the thief took the bag, he had made sure no-one was looking.
6. Before Antje asked how the little girl was, they told the sergeant what had happened.
7. After they had left the police station, they went back to their hotel.
8. As soon as they had got back to their hotel, they had a drink in the bar to calm their nerves.
Das sind alles Sätze, wo Past Perfect drin vorkommt.
Das läuft so ab:
zwei Handlungen finden in der Verg. statt.
Die eine der beiden liegt aber noch vor der anderen.
Die, die eben vor der anderen liegt, muß im Past Perfect stehen. Das bildest
du immer mit had (egal ob he she it !) und dann mit der 3. Form des
Verbs (wenn unregelmäßig) ansonsten -ed anhängen.
Die Handlung, die dann danach kommt, muß wieder im Simple Past stehen.
Ich denke, die Schwierigkeit besteht darin, dass man da immer sehr
genau schauen muß, welche Handlung denn nun wirklich die erste war.
Besonders dann, wenn da so Worte wie before und after drin vorkommen.
-
Dublinfan
Vielleicht schaff ich den zweiten Teil noch vorm Mittagessen...
1. The green car quickly drove away after the accident.
das sieht richtig aus
2. Antje and Michael ran to help the child immediately.
sieht auch ok aus
3. The driver of another kindly car stopped to help them.
hier würd ich das kindly hinter das car setzen:
another car kindly stopped (kindly bezieht sich auf die art und weise
wie sie anhielten : freundlicherweise)
4. The child was bleeding heavily.
ok
5. She was obviously in bad shape.
ok (das Adj. bad beschreibt ein Hauptwort - keine Veränderung mit ly!)
6. A thief took a bag out of the back of a white car and opened it sneaky.
würde hier sneakily sagen
7. The thief took the lap-top while everybody else was helping the child probably.
probably möglicherweise vor took
8. The thief took callours advantage of the situation.
hier bin ich mir nicht sicher. Zum einen kenn ich das Wort callours nicht.
Soll das evtl. calluous heißen? Ich weiß nicht, ob das Wort dann advantage
oder took beschreiben soll. Je nachdem kommt ly oder nicht.
Verstehst Du, wann Du das ly brauchst?
ly kommt immer dann, wenn ein Adjektiv ein Verb beschreibt.
He drives slowly.
Aber nicht, wenn es beschreibt, wie etwas ist.
He is slow.
Und auch nicht, wenn es ein Hauptwort beschreibt:
It is a slow car.
Natürlich gibt es unzählige Ausnahmen hier...
1. The green car quickly drove away after the accident.
das sieht richtig aus
2. Antje and Michael ran to help the child immediately.
sieht auch ok aus
3. The driver of another kindly car stopped to help them.
hier würd ich das kindly hinter das car setzen:
another car kindly stopped (kindly bezieht sich auf die art und weise
wie sie anhielten : freundlicherweise)
4. The child was bleeding heavily.
ok
5. She was obviously in bad shape.
ok (das Adj. bad beschreibt ein Hauptwort - keine Veränderung mit ly!)
6. A thief took a bag out of the back of a white car and opened it sneaky.
würde hier sneakily sagen
7. The thief took the lap-top while everybody else was helping the child probably.
probably möglicherweise vor took
8. The thief took callours advantage of the situation.
hier bin ich mir nicht sicher. Zum einen kenn ich das Wort callours nicht.
Soll das evtl. calluous heißen? Ich weiß nicht, ob das Wort dann advantage
oder took beschreiben soll. Je nachdem kommt ly oder nicht.
Verstehst Du, wann Du das ly brauchst?
ly kommt immer dann, wenn ein Adjektiv ein Verb beschreibt.
He drives slowly.
Aber nicht, wenn es beschreibt, wie etwas ist.
He is slow.
Und auch nicht, wenn es ein Hauptwort beschreibt:
It is a slow car.
Natürlich gibt es unzählige Ausnahmen hier...
-
Dublinfan
Nachdem das Essen immer noch vor sich hin kocht, kann ich auch noch in die
Dritte Runde gehen. Sorry , dass das hier alles so zerstückelt ist. Vielleicht ist es
aber auch übersichtlicher deshalb.
1.The green car overtook the little girl.- The little girl is overtaken by the green car.
was overtaken ... (weil im Aktivsatz auch simple past steht - mußt dich immer
an die Zeit halten, die im Aktivsatz steht)
2. Antje and the driver of a white car helped the child.- The child was helped by Antje and the driver of the white car.
Sieht ok aus!
3. The driver of the white car applied a bandage to the child's head.- A bandage was applied to the child's head by the driver of the white car.
Sieht auch ok aus!
4. The driver of the white car had left the back of his car open.- The back of his car had left opened by the driver of the white car.
The back of the car had been left open by ...
Das ist aber auch ein schwerer Satz, muß ich zugeben. Du mußt oben nicht
his car sagen, weil hinten ja ohnehin erwähnt wird, wem das Auto gehört.
Das wäre jetzt irgendwie "doppeltgemoppelt" wie man so schön sagt.
Das ist auch wieder Past perfect, aber im Passiv.
5. A thief took a lap-top from the back of gthe car.- A lap-top from the back of the car was taken by a thief.
A lap-top was taken from the back of the car by a thief.
Kann dir jetzt nicht wirklich erklären, warum man die Worte verstellt. Aber mein
Gefühl sagt mir, dass es so heißen sollte...
6. The police questioned Antje and Michael about the accident and the theft.- Antje and Michael was questioned about the accident and the theft by the police.
were questioned (weil es zwei Personen sind - they were)
7. The police caught the driver of the green car later. - The driver of the green car was caught later by the police.
richtig!
Na, dann ham wirs ja doch noch geschafft!
Viel Glück damit
Dritte Runde gehen. Sorry , dass das hier alles so zerstückelt ist. Vielleicht ist es
aber auch übersichtlicher deshalb.
1.The green car overtook the little girl.- The little girl is overtaken by the green car.
was overtaken ... (weil im Aktivsatz auch simple past steht - mußt dich immer
an die Zeit halten, die im Aktivsatz steht)
2. Antje and the driver of a white car helped the child.- The child was helped by Antje and the driver of the white car.
Sieht ok aus!
3. The driver of the white car applied a bandage to the child's head.- A bandage was applied to the child's head by the driver of the white car.
Sieht auch ok aus!
4. The driver of the white car had left the back of his car open.- The back of his car had left opened by the driver of the white car.
The back of the car had been left open by ...
Das ist aber auch ein schwerer Satz, muß ich zugeben. Du mußt oben nicht
his car sagen, weil hinten ja ohnehin erwähnt wird, wem das Auto gehört.
Das wäre jetzt irgendwie "doppeltgemoppelt" wie man so schön sagt.
Das ist auch wieder Past perfect, aber im Passiv.
5. A thief took a lap-top from the back of gthe car.- A lap-top from the back of the car was taken by a thief.
A lap-top was taken from the back of the car by a thief.
Kann dir jetzt nicht wirklich erklären, warum man die Worte verstellt. Aber mein
Gefühl sagt mir, dass es so heißen sollte...
6. The police questioned Antje and Michael about the accident and the theft.- Antje and Michael was questioned about the accident and the theft by the police.
were questioned (weil es zwei Personen sind - they were)
7. The police caught the driver of the green car later. - The driver of the green car was caught later by the police.
richtig!
Na, dann ham wirs ja doch noch geschafft!
Viel Glück damit
-
lion_girl_1985
Re: Zeitform,richtige Form?,Passiv
Ich nehm das nochmal als Beispiel.lion_girl_1985 hat geschrieben:
2. When he has called the ambulance, Michael went back to help Antje and the driver of the white car.
MfG,Sabrina
Michael hat doch die Polizei angerufen. Also Michael ist Subjekt und die Ambulance ist Objekt.
Dann einmal tauschen.
After the ambulance had been called, Michael went back.......
Hallo,
bei der Aufgabe 3, beim 2.Satz geht es nicht um das Setzen von Aktiv ins Passiv, sondern um das Einsetzen der richtigen Zeitform.
MfG,Sabrina
-
Dublinfan
-
lion_girl_1985
-
lion_girl_1985
Hallo,
habe wieder einen Text, wo es um das Einsetzen der richtigen Zeitform geht:
Pam was born in Auckland, New Zealand, on 19th November,1954. She went to school in New Zealand. In 1981 she came to London, where she eventually found a job with a dailey newspaper. After has been working successfully as a sports reporter for several years, she became one of the
editors of the news section. She is working mainly in the office now. Her friend Antje was born in New Zealand, too, but Antje's parents took her back to Germany when she was six years old and Antje went to school in Germany. Antje visits Pam when she is in Britain, and Pam is visiting Antje when she is in Germany. Pam will visit Antje in Hamburg next year.
Danke,
MfG,Sabrina
habe wieder einen Text, wo es um das Einsetzen der richtigen Zeitform geht:
Pam was born in Auckland, New Zealand, on 19th November,1954. She went to school in New Zealand. In 1981 she came to London, where she eventually found a job with a dailey newspaper. After has been working successfully as a sports reporter for several years, she became one of the
editors of the news section. She is working mainly in the office now. Her friend Antje was born in New Zealand, too, but Antje's parents took her back to Germany when she was six years old and Antje went to school in Germany. Antje visits Pam when she is in Britain, and Pam is visiting Antje when she is in Germany. Pam will visit Antje in Hamburg next year.
Danke,
MfG,Sabrina
-
boert
1)
[...] a job with a daileynewspaper.
2) After has been working successfully
Da fehlt das Subjekt, daher kann die Zeitform nicht passen.
3)Antje visits Pam when she is in Britain, and Pam is visiting Antje when she is in Germany.
Bist du sicher, dass die Verlaufsform im 2ten Satzteil richtig ist?
4)Pam will visit Antje in Hamburg next year.
Da es sich um keinen spontanen Entschluss handelt, passt hier das going to-future.
[...] a job with a daileynewspaper.
2) After has been working successfully
Da fehlt das Subjekt, daher kann die Zeitform nicht passen.
3)Antje visits Pam when she is in Britain, and Pam is visiting Antje when she is in Germany.
Bist du sicher, dass die Verlaufsform im 2ten Satzteil richtig ist?
4)Pam will visit Antje in Hamburg next year.
Da es sich um keinen spontanen Entschluss handelt, passt hier das going to-future.
-
lion_girl_1985
boert hat geschrieben:1)
[...] a job with a daileynewspaper.
2) After has been working successfully
Da fehlt das Subjekt, daher kann die Zeitform nicht passen.
3)Antje visits Pam when she is in Britain, and Pam is visiting Antje when she is in Germany.
Bist du sicher, dass die Verlaufsform im 2ten Satzteil richtig ist?
4)Pam will visit Antje in Hamburg next year.
Da es sich um keinen spontanen Entschluss handelt, passt hier das going to-future.
Ich bin was die Zeiten betrifft etwas überfragt, bei
2) hatte ich an had worked gedacht
3) von dem Satz habe ich gar keine Ahnung
Sabrina
-
boert
-
lion_girl_1985
Nee,ich bin den Satz nochmal durchgegangen und vergessen abzutippen habe ich nichts...boert hat geschrieben:Wenn du bei 2) "had worked" einsetzen willst, fehlt das "she", oder?
Steht das "she" vielleicht im Original und du hast vergessen es abzutippen?
Denn sonst ginge nur "After working successfully as a sports reporter..."
Aber wie lässt sich 3) lösen?
MfG,Sabrina
-
Oli.W
