Könnte bitte trotzdem noch jemand nachgucken, ob ich nicht doch noch was verpasst habe? Was kritisiert Prinz Charles und wen greift er an?
Prince Charles criticizes the professors of architecture, who found out through a 30 years of experimented with new materials that a man is a machine. ButPrince Charles criticizes the building planner and archticts, too, who believed that the buildings should reflect the new spirit of the age. He finds the new public and commercial buildings ugly, dull and heartless. In his opinion that he must done something but he was too young earlier. He did not imagine himself that the buildings would destroy one day. For him it is an attack on the old principles that affected the music,education, architecture and art. the architecture of the fifties and sixties do not arrive a few regions. Prince Charles thinks that they have ended up with Frankenstein monsters because they are unpopular- out of the professors of architecture, who find these good. The people, who do not find this good must live with these. The architects want that the buildings reflect a high technology. With it is the past irrelevant. But Prince Charles warns against that the man(hier im Text Mensch) can forget the past, lost their souls and the buildings can lost their souls, too. If you give up the principles of 2, 500 years of architecture, then suffer the population. The buildings only show the technology of the moment until it comes someting new.
Bei einigen Dingen bin ich mir unsicher, ob ich sie richtig formuliert habe.
Vielen Dank im Voraus für die Hilfe.
aber Du siehst vielleicht ein, dass so eine Falschschreibung von "architect" und das ein oder andere Fehlerlein nicht danach aussahen, als hättest Du genau nachgeschaut, ja?