Wir schreiben bald eine Arbeit über argumentations. Deswegen habe ich diesen Text hier geschrieben, bin mir aber noch sehr unsicher, ob das auch alles richtig ist. Wäre nett, wenn ihr das korrigieren könntet! Danke
argumentation – should be pirated material forbidden?
In the following I shall consider the question - Should be pirated material forbidden?
First of all I want to start with the worse revenues from the film industry.
Through their bad revenue they make high losses, so they not even get their expected money and had overestimated the costs.
As a result they may go bust.
Another reason to forbid pirated material are become the decreasingly cinema attendance.
So not only the producer make less money but also the cinema industry.
Therefore the ticket prices as well as the “cinema food” will get more expensive.
Even so the “cinema feeling” gets lost, because much people watch the films at home on their smaller TV without the typical popcorn or nachos.
On the other hand it’s very useful, because it is costless to watch all the films at home and it is quicker and easier to reach what you want.
You may save time, because you don’t have to go to the shop and buy a film or go to the cinema.
If you want, you can stop the film and watch it further anytime.
Thus you have more films or music, never would you buy.
Consequently you may watch it one or two times and then it ends somewhere in a corner.
Further the films and music may be exchange with friends.
I think for the film and cinema industry it is very important to forbid pirated material,
but for the consumer the pirated material is very useful, because you may save a lot of money.