Verbesserung von meinem Text

Sätze und kurze Texte, die korrigiert wurden
Kasperl1020

Verbesserung von meinem Text

Beitrag von Kasperl1020 »

Hallo!

Wäre jemand so lieb und könnte meinen Text korrigieren? Mein Schwachpunkt sind Präpositionen und Bindewörter... Ich neige dazu, oftmals also und but zu verwenden, obwohl ich das eher vermeiden sollte.
Vielen Dank!


Nothing is wrong with the world – but is something wrong with humans?
 
Whenever you open the newspaper, there is usually no reason to smile. The dailies are news-crammed with natural disasters, terrorists’ attacks and cruelties to humans and animals. You can observe many people who are shaking their head and ask themselves what is merely wrong with this world. But who is responsible for this? Is nature inherently cruel?  Well, laws of nature are tough. But I personally think that most atrocities are perpetrated by humans.


Initially I would like to point out that we can’t measure everything by the same yardstick. I am well aware that there are many humans who make the world to a better place. The big authors and musicians are brilliant and invite you to dream and to believe at love or think about big philosophic questions.  What is more, there are many charities and volunteers try to help humans and animals in need. Also there are a lot of people who try to live environmentally conscious and they try to cause as little damage as possible. Unfortunately I cannot help feeling that this is not the majority. When you dip in the past, there always have been terrible crimes against humanity. But is there really a difference to today? Thousands of humans suffer from famine or political crises. If you ask me, there would be theoretically a solution: balance. There should not be such a big divide between poor and rich. But all we care about first world problems. 


In my view, human activities surely do not make the world to a better place. Money makes the world go round. Egoism and fear is also a crux of the matter. We are lucky to live in one of the best supplied country of the world and we cannot complain about anything.  However, we pay a high price for it: Exploitation of other people, pollution and cruelties to animals. Only residents of the first world have pulled the lucky ticket.

Keswick (Contributor)

Re: Verbesserung von meinem Text

Beitrag von Keswick (Contributor) »

Kasperl1020 hat geschrieben:Hallo!

Wäre jemand so lieb und könnte meinen Text korrigieren? Mein Schwachpunkt sind Präpositionen und Bindewörter... Ich neige dazu, oftmals also und but zu verwenden, obwohl ich das eher vermeiden sollte. 
Vielen Dank!


Nothing is wrong with the world – but is something wrong with humans?
 
Whenever you open the newspaper, there is usually no reason to smile. The dailies are news-crammed with natural disasters, terrorist attacks and cruelties towards humans and animals. You can observe many people who shake their heads and ask themselves what is merely wrong with this world. But who is responsible for this? Is nature inherently cruel?  Well, laws of nature are tough. But I personally think that most atrocities are perpetrated by humans.


Initially I would like to point out that we can’t measure everything by the same yardstick. I am well aware, that there are many humans who make the world to a better place. The big authors and musicians are brilliant and invite you to dream and to believe in love or to think about big philosophic questions.  What is more, there are many charities and volunteers trying to help humans and animals in need. Also there are a lot of people who try to live environmentally conscious and they attempt to cause as little damage as possible. Unfortunately I cannot help but feel that this is not the majority. When you dip into the past, there have always been terrible crimes against humanity. But is there really a difference to today? Thousands of humans suffer from famine or political crises. If you ask me, theoratically there would be a solution: balance. There should not be such a big divide between the poor and the rich. But all we care about are first world problems.  In my opinion, human activities surely do not make the world to a better place. Money makes the world go round. Egoism and fear are also a crux of the matter. We are lucky to live in one of the best supplied countries in the world and we cannot complain about anything.  However, we pay a high price for it: Exploitation of other people, pollution and cruelty towards animals. Only residents of the first world are lucky.
Hello,

I wouldn't end this essay but saying that only the residents of the first world are lucky without elaborating further, and maybe comparing your elaborations to the third world countries. The way the essay ends now seems like you couldn't be bothered to continue.

Best regards
Keswick

tiorthan

Re: Verbesserung von meinem Text

Beitrag von tiorthan »

The terms "First World" and "Third World", which have to be capitalized, originated during the Cold War and were originally not used to describe a countries development but rather its political alignment. Using them now to mean developed and underdeveloped countries is a bit muddy and should generally be avoided in a sociological or political essay.

Also, you seem to conclude that poverty is the biggest driver of violence in the world. That is objectively, measurably wrong. The single largest reason for violence has been ideology with religion leading by a significant margin. It's not egotism an fear that drives violence, it's arrogance and political agendas.

Kasperl1020

Re: Verbesserung von meinem Text

Beitrag von Kasperl1020 »

Hallo!

Ich danke dir vielmals für die Korrektur.
Kannst du mir irgendwelche Tipps geben, die mein Englisch verbessern könnten?
Ich mache ja noch einige Fehler...

LG

Schuyler

Re: Verbesserung von meinem Text

Beitrag von Schuyler »

[...]

Well, laws of nature are tough, but I personally think that most atrocities are perpetrated by humans.

[...]

Initially, I would like to point out that we can’t measure everything by the same yardstick. I am well aware [no comma] that there are many humans who make the world a better place. The big authors and musicians are brilliant and invite you to dream and to believe in love or to think about big philosophical questions. What is more, there are many charities and volunteers trying to help humans and animals in need. Also, there are a lot of people who try to live environmentally conscious and they attempt to cause as little damage as possible. Unfortunately, I cannot help feeling [although "I cannot help but feel" is also correct] that this is not the majority. When you dip into the past, there have always been terrible crimes against humanity, but is there really a difference between then and now? Thousands of humans suffer from famine or political crises. If you ask me, theoretically there is a solution: balance. There should not be such a big divide between the rich and the poor, yet all we care about are first-world problems. ["The rich and the poor" is something of an established phrase and more commonly said in that order.] In my opinion, human activities surely do not make the world a better place. Money makes the world go round. Egoism and fear are also a major problem.* We are lucky to live in one of the best-supplied countries in the world, and we cannot complain about anything. However, we pay a high price for it: exploitation of other people, pollution, and cruelty towards animals. Only residents of the First World are lucky.
*"The crux of the matter" is a phrase that means the most important, critical, or central point of an issue. So you would not say "a crux of the matter," but rather "the crux of the matter," and only if you actually mean it is the single most critical point.



Your English is wonderful: grammar, vocabulary, and sentence structure are all very good. Most of the mistakes I see here are only minor things that you should be able to improve on easily as long as you keep practicing. So, the best advice I have is just that: practice, practice, practice. :)

I don't notice any major issues I would suggest you work on, but two small things are that you do use "but" a lot, like you said, and you often start a sentence that way when it may work better connected to the previous sentence. There are many other conjunctions you can use instead, such as yet, however, and although, to add more variation. The meaning and usage of these words is similar, though not exactly the same (so I recommend checking the definitions and some example sentences to make sure you understand how each word is used,) and can sometimes better express what you mean than if you say "but."

For example, I suggested connecting these two sentences in your essay and changing but to yet: "There should not be such a big divide between the rich and the poor, yet all we care about are first-world problems." The sentences are still correct if you write them separately; however, seeing how they have a very direct relation to each other, they sound smoother if you connect them. The switch to "yet" is just an example of an alternative conjunction, not actually a correction -- "but" is perfectly fine here as well.