Lückentext Grammatik

[oggy528]

Hey Leute,

könnt ihr schauen ob die Zeiten richtig sind, falls nein --> mich bitte korrigieren

1. Since 1965 there (to be )   has been a steady increase in German exports.
2. At the moment German politicians (to discuss) are discussing an import tax on Chinese solar pannels.
3.In which year (China/ to become) China became the worldwide leader in exports?
4.During the Olympic games in China the government (not / to allow) didn't allow ordinary private traffic in order to prevent pollution.
5.Queen Elizabeth II (not/ celebrate) doesn't celebrate her birthday in February. Her official birthday party in in June.
6.Yesterday while Ms Smith (to pay) was playing for her goods a thief (to steal) stole her handbag.
7.Before he went for his job interview he (to read) has read all available information about the company.
8.Jane is an environmental officer. She ( to advise) advises companies about environmental laws.
9.Look, in this video she ( to talk) is talking about the latest EU laws.
10.He (always / to want) always wants to find a work placement in Paris.
11.She (to study) has studied for hours but still is not confident to pass.

[tiorthan]

3.In which year (China/ to become) China became the worldwide leader in exports?

Fragesätze weisen eine Besonderheit auf, die Verb-Subjekt-Inversion genannt wird. In einem Fragesatz wird nämlich das finite Verb vor das Subjekt gestellt.

Also "In which year became China the worldwide leader in exports?"
Jaaaaa vor hundert Jahren vielleicht (und selbst da bin ich mir nich sicher). Wenn das Verb so ganz alleine da steht, dann setzt es heute kaum noch jemand vor das Subjekt sondern stattdessen wird das Hilfsverb "do" in den Satz eingebaut.

"In which year did China become the worldwide leader in exports?"

6.Yesterday while Ms Smith (to pay) was paying for her goods a thief (to steal) stole her handbag.

7.Before he went for his job interview he (to read) had read all available information about the company.[/quote]
Wenn der erste Teil des Satzes mit "went" schon so deutlich in der Vergangenheit steht, dann ist es unmöglich, dass ein davon abhängiger Satz nicht in der Vergangenheit steht.
Im Englischen sind Vergangenheit und Nichtvergangenheit strikt getrennt.

[oggy528]

Der Rest ist alles richtig ?

Vielen lieben dank !